Editorial Policy

This page explains how we decide what to publish, how we source what we claim, and how we fix it when we get something wrong. “Editorial policy” sounds formal — in practice it means: don’t say a wagering requirement works a certain way unless we can point to how wagering requirements generally work, and don’t dress up a promotional term as a guarantee.

How we source claims

When an article explains a mechanic — how a wagering requirement is calculated, how a no-deposit bonus differs from a welcome deposit match, how a cool-off period differs from full self-exclusion — it’s describing how that mechanic generally works across the industry, not asserting a specific number or term for a specific operator. Operator-specific terms (minimum deposit, wagering multiplier, expiry window) vary and change; we don’t publish a number as current fact without a live source, and we tell readers plainly to check an operator’s own published terms before claiming an offer.

What we won’t do

• Invent a payout percentage, RTP figure, or wagering multiplier to make an article read more concrete.
• Publish a “best bonus” or “top rated” list — that implies a scoring method we don’t run.
• Claim personal play experience with a specific operator we haven’t actually used.

Correction & update policy

Bonus terms change — an operator can adjust a wagering multiplier or retire a promotion between when we publish and when someone reads it. If a reader flags something that’s gone stale or was wrong when we published it, we correct the article and note the update. We don’t quietly edit a piece after a factual complaint without saying so. To flag something, use the contact page or the unresolved concerns page if you’ve already reached out once without a response.